Conflict complaint against Rangaswamy, Gaekwad rendered ‘infructuous’

The BCCI ethics officer, D. K. Jain, has rendered the conflict of interest complaint against former CAC members Shantha Rangaswamy and Anshuman Gaekwad as “infructuous”.

Published : Dec 29, 2019 12:45 IST , NEW DELHI

The conflict of interest complaint against Anshuman Gaekwad (left) and Shantha Rangaswamy (right) has been rendered “infructuous”, while the case involving Kapil Dev (centre) has not been decided.
The conflict of interest complaint against Anshuman Gaekwad (left) and Shantha Rangaswamy (right) has been rendered “infructuous”, while the case involving Kapil Dev (centre) has not been decided.
lightbox-info

The conflict of interest complaint against Anshuman Gaekwad (left) and Shantha Rangaswamy (right) has been rendered “infructuous”, while the case involving Kapil Dev (centre) has not been decided.

BCCI ethics officer D. K. Jain has rendered the conflict of interest complaint against former cricketers and CAC members Shantha Rangaswamy and Anshuman Gaekwad as “infructuous” but the case involving Kapil Dev has still not been decided.

Jain had called Rangaswamy, Gaekwad and Kapil for a personal hearing on December 27 and 28 even though all three had stepped down from the Cricket Advisory Committee (CAC) in September and October, following the complaint filed by Madhya Pradesh Cricket Association (MPCA) life member Sanjeev Gupta.

It had been claimed that all three don multiple cricketing roles, when as per the BCCI constitution, no person can occupy more than one post at the same time.

“Since they (Gaekwad, Rangaswamy) have resigned from their respective posts, the complaint has been disposed of. In Kapil’s case, the complainant needed more time to file an application, I have given him that,” Jain told PTI on Sunday.

Read: BCCI chief Ganguly meets Dravid for 'general meeting'

Rangaswamy, who like Gaekwad is on the BCCI apex council, is no more involved with Indian Cricketers Assoication (ICA) as its director.

Gaekwad was a working group member which was set up for ICA’s formation and is also no more part of BCCI’s affiliation committee.

While Kapil and Rangaswamy were unavailable, Gaekwad deposed before Jain.

The case concerning BCCI employee Mayank Parikh, who also faces a conflict of interest charge, is not settled yet.

The Kapil-led CAC, when it was existent, had appointed the senior men’s and women’s head coach.

Being part of CAC is an honorary job and World Cup-winning captain Kapil had earlier made it clear that conflict of interest should not be applicable to those who are not being paid for their services.

Conflict of interest is a serious issue facing Indian cricket and the BCCI has sought Supreme Court’s directions on the matter.

Sign in to unlock all user benefits
  • Get notified on top games and events
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign up / manage to our newsletters with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early bird access to discounts & offers to our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide to our community guidelines for posting your comment