Ad-hoc committee meets Vengsarkar amidst uncertainty

According to an MCA insider, Vengsarkar "sought clarity and the way forward" following the events that have unfolded during the week.

Published : May 16, 2019 22:59 IST , Mumbai

Dilip Vengsarkar had discussed the possible names of the selectors for various age-groups and Ranji Trophy for 2019-20 on May 8.
Dilip Vengsarkar had discussed the possible names of the selectors for various age-groups and Ranji Trophy for 2019-20 on May 8.
lightbox-info

Dilip Vengsarkar had discussed the possible names of the selectors for various age-groups and Ranji Trophy for 2019-20 on May 8.

 

A hurried announcement of various selection panels has led to a flurry of controversies within the Mumbai Cricket Association (MCA) ranks. As a result, to discuss the way out, an ad-hoc committee of the MCA met with Cricket Improvement Committee (CIC) chairman Dilip Vengsarkar on Friday.

According to an MCA insider, Vengsarkar "sought clarity and the way forward" following the events that have unfolded during the week. However, the ad-hoc committee in itself is in a fix of sorts on how to rectify the faux pas over selectors' announcement.

READ| Vengsarkar bats for K.L. Rahul at No 4

A day later the CIC chaired by Vengsarkar had discussed the possible names of the selectors for various age-groups and Ranji Trophy for 2019-20 on May 8, the MCA issued a press release appointing the selectors.

Flummoxed by the announcement, Raju Kulkarni resigned from CIC, claiming that the committee hadn't finalised the list. Moreover, it came to light that multiple selectors announced over the weekend doesn’t fulfill the criteria of having played First Class cricket.

However, with the CIC being reduced to two members — Vengsarkar and Kiran Mokashi who is also upset over the selectors' goof-up — it cannot reconstitute the selection committees. Add to that the fact that a complaint has been filed to BCCI Ethics Officer over Vengsarkar's eligibility to be a CIC member and the MCA seems to be stuck in a no man's land.

The ad-hoc committee is understood to have appointed since it has requested amicus curiae to the Supreme Court, P.S. Narsimha, to exclude cricketers from being sub- or special committees even after exhausting the nine-year tenure cap for being a counsellor.

A member of the ad-hoc committee sounded optimistic that it will "find a solution in a couple of days".

Sign in to unlock all user benefits
  • Get notified on top games and events
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign up / manage to our newsletters with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early bird access to discounts & offers to our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide to our community guidelines for posting your comment