ICC should thoroughly look into 'Umpire's Call' in DRS: Tendulkar

Tendulkar urged the ICC to revisit the concept, after the Australian batsmen survived close LBW appeals on the third day of the second Test against India.

Australian batsmen Joe Burns and Marnus Labuschagne survived LBW appeals despite replays showing that the ball would have gone on to clip the bails on Monday.

The legendary Sachin Tendulkar on Monday urged the ICC to thoroughly revisit the concept of ''Umpire's Call'' in the Decision Review System (DRS) after India ended up on the wrong side of the rule on the third day of the second Test against Australia in Melbourne.

The ''Umpire's Call'' primarily comes into the picture if a review has been sought for LBW. In a situation where the umpire has ruled not out, even if the ball is shown to be hitting the stumps on review, the TV umpire has no powers to change the decision.

The only consolation for the bowling team is that its review remains intact.

READ |

"The reason players opt for a review is because they''re unhappy with the decision taken by the on-field umpire. The DRS system needs to be thoroughly looked into by the @ICC, especially for the ''Umpires Call''," Tendulkar tweeted.

This was after Australian batsmen Joe Burns and Marnus Labuschagne were lucky to survive LBW appeals despite replays showing that the ball would have gone on to clip the bails.

Later, posting a video on the 100mb app , Tendulkar said, "I am not convinced with the DRS rule at all. Once you have gone upstairs to the third umpire then the on-field umpire''s decision should not come into the picture at all." Tendulkar said if the ball is hitting in line, it hardly matters whether the trajectory covers the entire wicket or just a bail.

The Decision Review System (DRS) has been brought in for a reason by @ICC & if we are trusting the DRS then the reliance on it has to be 100%.#AUSvINDhttps://t.co/fOy8mdgKsTpic.twitter.com/SpA11jvEHM

— Sachin Tendulkar (@sachin_rt) December 28, 2020

 

"It doesn't matter whether the ball is hitting 10 per cent or 15 per cent or 70 per cent because when you get bowled, none of this matters. I understand that the tracking system is not 100 per cent accurate but can you name one umpire who has never made a mistake?" he asked.

"We all make mistakes, but once we have decided to go with technology, let''s back it and over a period of time, we will get closer to 100 per cent.

"Even if the ball is just clipping the bail and the umpire has given not out, that decision should be overturned when they have referred to the third umpire. It (umpire''s call) is too confusing and somewhere it is unfair to bowlers also." It was Australian spin legend Shane Warne, who first red-flagged the rule set by ICC's Cricket Committee which is headed by Anil Kumble.

Warne has time and again said that he could never understand the Umpire's Call.

"If the ball hits the stumps, it cannot be out and not out at the same time," Warne had said in an interview to PTI last year.