England's defeat at Lord's a consequence of poor batting

England lost to India because its batsmen lacked the heart, the will and the technique to bat two sessions on a wicket that held no devils.

Published : Aug 22, 2021 19:59 IST , Chennai

Virat Kohli (left) celebrates as England's Rory Burns (right) is dismissed for a duck in the second innings. England was bowled out for 120. - GETTY IMAGES
Virat Kohli (left) celebrates as England's Rory Burns (right) is dismissed for a duck in the second innings. England was bowled out for 120. - GETTY IMAGES
lightbox-info

Virat Kohli (left) celebrates as England's Rory Burns (right) is dismissed for a duck in the second innings. England was bowled out for 120. - GETTY IMAGES

England did not go down in the second Test at Lord’s owing to the ill-advised bouncer barrage at Jasprit Bumrah.

The host certainly blew an opportunity to win on a dramatic last day with its bizarre bowling tactics at the Indian tail that wagged. But then, England lost because its batsmen lacked the heart, the will and the technique to bat two sessions on a wicket that held no devils.

ALSO READ - Michael Vaughan on bouncer tactic: What the hell is going on?

Indeed, England’s capitulation for 120 in just 51.5 overs mirrored a disturbing lack of defensive technique that is a direct consequence of an overdose of cricket in the shorter formats. The batsmen lose sight of their off-stump, push hard at the ball, the feet and the hands no longer move in symphony, there are holes in defence, and body balance is a million miles away.

And the lack of patience to see off spells is often shocking. A batting disaster is waiting to happen.

The Indian bowling was good, not devastating, and once England lost its only fully rounded batsman Joe Root, there was going to be only one result.

Test-match specialist Pujara

Looking at the carnage in the English camp, India must consider itself fortunate that it still possesses a Test match specialist in Cheteshwar Pujara. His 206-ball second innings 45 stonewalling the English pace attack that threatened to make serious inroads was an extremely valuable Test-match innings.

Batting in Tests is not always about momentum that has become a fashionable term with many. It’s a lot about playing the situation, soaking up the pressure, and blunting the bowling. Once this is accomplished, the others can cash in.

ashwin-vihari
R. Ashwin and Hanuma Vihari batted out 42.4 overs on the final day of the Sydney Test in January, 2021, to ensure a draw for India. - GETTY IMAGES
 

It is no coincidence that when India staged a famous jailbreak in the Sydney Test last season, the two batsmen, Hanuma Vihari and R. Ashwin, who bravely batted 42.4 overs to halt the Australian surge for a win, had minimal exposure to batting in Twenty20 cricket.

Vihari, like Pujara, is a Test match specialist and the chances for Ashwin to bat in IPL games are few and far between.

After the debacle in the 2015 ODI World Cup Down Under, England made a conscious effort to revamp its white-ball teams - it found astonishing success too - but has clearly failed to groom Test match specialists.

England’s batting debacle at Lord’s was in several ways reminiscent of its collapse on the final day of the Chennai Test of 2016. England went in for Tea at 167 for four but still ended up being bowled out. And the strokeplay, to put it mildly, was rash.

What England needs is grit, steel, and that famous bulldog spirit that appears to have vanished with the likes of Ken Barrington.

Sign in to unlock all user benefits
  • Get notified on top games and events
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign up / manage to our newsletters with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early bird access to discounts & offers to our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide to our community guidelines for posting your comment