Trouble over BCCI SGM?

The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI)’s Special General Meeting, scheduled to be held in New Delhi on Tuesday, could run into rough weather with three associations raising objection to the notice issued by the acting secretary Amitabh Choudhary.

Published : Jul 10, 2017 22:48 IST , New Delhi

BCCI’s Cricket Advisory Committee (CAC) member Sourav Ganguly and Board’s acting secretary Amitabh Choudhary in Mumbai on Monday.
BCCI’s Cricket Advisory Committee (CAC) member Sourav Ganguly and Board’s acting secretary Amitabh Choudhary in Mumbai on Monday.
lightbox-info

BCCI’s Cricket Advisory Committee (CAC) member Sourav Ganguly and Board’s acting secretary Amitabh Choudhary in Mumbai on Monday.

Former BCCI president N Srinivasan and his faction are pulling all stops to stall the Lodha Committee reforms with six state units officially raising objections against the Special General Meeting (SGM), scheduled to be held here today.

The six state associations that have written to the BCCI’s acting president CK Khanna are all Srinivasan loyalists.

They are, his own association the Tamil Nadu CA, “disqualified” official Niranjan Shah’s Saurashtra Cricket Association, treasurer Aniruddh Chaudhry’s Haryana CA, TC Matthew’s Kerala CA, Goa CA and Karnataka State CA.

Acting president Khanna has already written a letter to acting Secretary Amitabh Choudhary, asking him to take appropriate steps going by the book.

All these associations have objected to the fact that a minimum 10-day notice period is necessary to convene a Special General Meeting of the BCCI as per the constitution (as per Article 17 sub clause (iii)).

Majority of the state associations are in favour of calling the SGM in order to break the impasse and move on by implementing all but three Lodha Committee Reforms as recommended by the Special Committee of BCCI.

The anti Srinivasan faction’s contention is that late Jagmohan Dalmiya had convened a SGM back in December 2002 by giving a two-day notice.

However, a senior BCCI official, who had attended that meeting said: “Yes, Mr Dalmiya had convened that meeting because all members had unanimously condoned and the meeting was held.

“But in this case there are multiple associations raising objections. If they go ahead with the meeting, these units will move court filing a petition to get stay order on all decisions taken.”

It is a Catch-22 situation for the BCCI top brass as not showing enough intent will make them incur the wrath of the Committee of Administrators (CoA), which is set to file a scathing Status Report in Supreme Court.

The SGM is scheduled at 4:30 pm but it will be interesting to see whether the meeting takes place or is adjourned after a start.

Sign in to unlock all user benefits
  • Get notified on top games and events
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign up / manage to our newsletters with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early bird access to discounts & offers to our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide to our community guidelines for posting your comment