PSG's signing of Messi rekindles debate on UEFA FFP rules

Paris Saint-Germain had fallen foul of the rules, but avoided excessive punishment after winning appeals through the Court of Arbitration for Sport.

Published : Aug 13, 2021 09:05 IST

Lionel Messi's reported €25 million signing-on fee and annual salary of €63 million in addition to free marquee signings of Ramos and Donnarumma have raised questions on the viability of UEFA FFP.
Lionel Messi's reported €25 million signing-on fee and annual salary of €63 million in addition to free marquee signings of Ramos and Donnarumma have raised questions on the viability of UEFA FFP.
lightbox-info

Lionel Messi's reported €25 million signing-on fee and annual salary of €63 million in addition to free marquee signings of Ramos and Donnarumma have raised questions on the viability of UEFA FFP.

Paris St Germain's signing of Lionel Messi has re-ignited a debate over the effectiveness of UEFA's Financial Fair Play (FFP) rules, which were designed to curb excessive spending but have been relaxed in the last year due to the coronavirus pandemic.

The rules were introduced in 2009 to prevent clubs from spending beyond their means and distorting the market, requiring teams to break even and keep wages and transfer fees in line with income.

PSG and Manchester City were among clubs to fall foul of the rules, although both teams avoided excessive punishment after winning appeals through the Court of Arbitration for Sport.

READ |  Messi back in training after joining PSG

A softening of rules to help clubs cope with the financial shock of the pandemic, however, means neither PSG nor City - which last week broke the Premier League transfer record to buy Jack Grealish for 100 million pounds ($138 million) – has had to worry about new investigations into its spending.

"We know the rules of Financial Fair Play, and we will always follow the regulations," said PSG chairman Nasser Al-Khelaifi at Messi's presentation on Wednesday.

"Before we do anything, we check with our commercial, financial and legal people. We have the capacity to sign him. If we sign Leo, it's because we can, otherwise, we would not have done it."

PSG's revenue for 2019-20 was 541 million euros, according to a report from KPMG, while its wage bill stood at 405 million euros.

BUMPER WAGES

PSG’s spending on salaries has soared in the last year, however, since signing Georginio Wijnaldum, Sergio Ramos and Gianluigi Donnarumma on free transfers, allowing it to offer bumper wages in place of transfer fees.

PSG has also splashed out 60 million euros on fullback Achraf Hakimi from Inter Milan while the signing of Messi, who will pocket a reported 25 million-euro signing-on fee and annual salary of €63 million, has inflated its wage bill even further.

The club's revenue, meanwhile, has fallen due to the pandemic and the French league's television rights deal collapsing. But for now, it has no obligation to break even.

The break-even rule could be removed altogether, according to Andrea Traverso, UEFA's director of financial stability and research, who in April described it as "purposeless" in the post-pandemic era.

Traverso suggested new rules should focus on the present and future rather than punishing clubs for past excesses.

UEFA declined to comment on what the future of financial fair play would look like or on whether the relaxing of the break-even rule cleared the way for PSG to sign Messi.

Another key rule change from UEFA was allowing owners to spend their own money to alleviate losses, which played into the hands of Qatari-backed PSG and Abu Dhabi-funded City but provided little relief to fan-owned FC Barcelona.

READ |  Lionel Messi's Paris St Germain package includes crypto fan tokens

The Catalans were also at the mercy of La Liga's financial fair play rules, which set each club a maximum budget each season according to its expected income.

Barca's budget for the 2019-20 campaign was 671 million euros, dropping to 347 million last season due to the pandemic.

It is reported to fall to between 160 million and 200 million for the next campaign, making it impossible for it to give Messi a new deal.

PSG, by contrast, benefited from the French football federation postponing requirements for its clubs to only spend 70 per cent of revenue on wages.

Sign in to unlock all user benefits
  • Get notified on top games and events
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign up / manage to our newsletters with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early bird access to discounts & offers to our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide to our community guidelines for posting your comment