The Nawab of Headingley

Published : Sep 23, 2006 00:00 IST

MANSUR ALI KHAN PATAUDI... led from the front against England at Headingley in 1967.-THE HINDU PHOTO LIBRARY
MANSUR ALI KHAN PATAUDI... led from the front against England at Headingley in 1967.-THE HINDU PHOTO LIBRARY
lightbox-info

MANSUR ALI KHAN PATAUDI... led from the front against England at Headingley in 1967.-THE HINDU PHOTO LIBRARY

Skipper Mansur Ali Khan, the Nawab of Pataudi Jr., led India's fightback in the 1967 Headingley Test from a seemingly hopeless position after the first two-and-a-half days. GULU EZEKIEL recapitulates.

The Indian tour of England in 1967 was a disaster from start to finish. A lack of pace attack, miserably wet weather leading up to the first Test match and a spate of injuries — the list of woes of the tourists was endless. Little surprise then that England completed a whitewash of the series.

There was a silver-lining though, and that was the manner in which captain Mansur Ali Khan, the Nawab of Pataudi Jr., led his country's fightback in the opening Test at Headingley, Leeds, from a seemingly hopeless position after the first two-and-a-half days.

India went in with two debutants, opening bowler Subrata Guha and batsman Ramesh Saxena. Injuries to two key players, all-rounder Rusi Surti, who was to open the bowling and the batting as well, and spin bowler Bishan Bedi were crushing blows to India's hopes.

It was Surti who made an early breakthrough, having John Edrich caught behind by Farokh Engineer in the second over of the match after Brian Close had won the toss and elected to bat. That would be Surti's lone wicket as he was struck on the knee while fielding and the rest of the bowlers — Bedi could bowl only 15 overs — toiled all day as England piled up 281 for three on the opening day. Ken Barrington was run out for 93 and Tom Graveney chipped in with 59. But the talking point was the snail-paced batting of local hero and opening batsman Geoff Boycott. Against the woefully inadequate Indian bowling, he crawled to 106 in the full day's play and the critics were baying for his blood.

So painfully slow was the Yorkshireman's batting that even his loyal fans left the ground in dismay in the last session of play in which he ground out 43 runs in the last two hours. This was, in fact, a distinct improvement on the start, as till the lunch interval Boycott had plodded to a miserable 25!

The next day Boycott stepped up the rate and was 246 not out when Close declared the innings closed at a massive 550 for four. Boycott's partnership with Basil D'Oliveira was worth 252 runs for the fourth wicket. The opener had scored 140 runs in less than four hours on the second day, but it was not enough to save his position.

Accused by the selectors of selfish batting, Boycott was dropped for the second Test, though he was back for the third and final one. It was a slight the legendary opening batsman has carried all his life. The England selectors though were under pressure from the press and felt they needed to make the decision in favour of lively cricket.

By the time the tourists had stumbled to 86 for six at the end of Day Two, most journalists — and probably some of the Indians too — had written off the match as a contest. It looked like it could be over in three days. Despite Engineer's bright 42 at the top, the rest of the batting had failed miserably and it was left to the captain himself to salvage some pride on the third morning.

This Pataudi did with a gallant 64, with some assistance from Surti, batting with a runner. Still, the total of 164 was woefully inadequate and there was no escaping the follow-on.

After the second day's play, Pataudi had given his team a pep talk. "This is beginning to be a good batting wicket, almost as good as Madras or Bombay and certainly the best you'll have to play on during the tour. If you can't get runs here, you won't get them anywhere. From now on we are going to take charge of the match."

India may not have taken charge of the match, but with Pataudi leading from the front, it certainly took the fight to the enemy camp. The turnaround began on the third day that ended with India looking good at 198 for two. They still needed another 188 runs to make England bat again. But the way the batsmen took control the second time round was indeed a revelation. Once again Engineer, who was outstanding behind the stumps as well, showed the way with a belligerent 87, including 14 fours. He added 168 with Ajit Wadekar at better than even time for the second wicket, and suddenly the dire predictions of gloom that had descended like a dark cloud over the Indian camp had miraculously lifted.

Off-spinner Ray Illingworth dismissed Wadekar for 91 early on the fourth morning. Chandu Borde soon followed for 33. But this time the rest of the batting refused to fold. The stage was now set for the two princes, Hanumant Singh and Pataudi to unfurl their regal strokes.

Save for Illingworth and fast bowler John Snow, the English bowling was not at its strongest, and Hanumant and Pataudi took India to the doorstep of making England bat again. Their stand was worth 134 before Hanumant was out to Illingworth for a sparkling 73. Pataudi had reached his third century against England and when stumps were drawn on the penultimate day, India's score of 475 for eight meant they led England by 89 runs. Thanks to the skipper's expert marshalling of the tail-enders, the last four wickets added a precious 122 runs. `Tiger' was ninth out for a brilliant 148, bowled by Illingworth and when Bedi was last man out, the Indian innings had ended on a scarcely believable 510 — a remarkable turnaround from the first innings. It meant England needed only 125 runs to wrap up the Test, a cakewalk considering its depth in batting.

Now came the final twist of a topsy-turvy Test. Chandrasekhar sent back Edrich, Barrington and Graveney cheaply, and with Prasanna accounting for John Murray, the spectators were stunned as England's score read 92 for 4! Catches though continued to go down as in the first innings and England made it home by six wickets. Another 70 or 80 runs and who knows what would have been the result?

`Pataudi Inspires Remarkable Recovery' read the headline in The Cricketer magazine. No wonder the English media now dubbed `Tiger' the `Nawab of Headingley.

THE SCORES

England v India, 1st Test, Headingley, Leeds, June 8-13, 1967.

Result: England won by 6 wickets.

England 550 for 4 wkts decl. (G. Boycott 246 n.o., K. F. Barrington 93, T. W. Graveney 59, B. L. D'Oliveira 109) and 126 for 4 (K. F. Barrington 46, B. S. Chandrasekhar 3-50) beat India 164 (F. M. Engineer 42, M. A. K. Pataudi 64; Hobbs 3-45, Illingworth 3-31) and 510 (F. M. Engineer 87, A. L. Wadekar 91, C. G. Borde 33, Hanumant Singh 73, M. A. K. Pataudi 148; Illingworth 4-100).

More stories from this issue

Sign in to unlock all user benefits
  • Get notified on top games and events
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign up / manage to our newsletters with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early bird access to discounts & offers to our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide to our community guidelines for posting your comment