Serena row could've been defused by umpire Ramos, says Davenport

Lindsay Davenport felt the umpire could have managed his row with Serena Williams, who felt a man would be treated differently, better.

Published : Sep 09, 2018 23:52 IST

Serena Williams loses her cool during the US Open final against Naomi Osaka on Saturday.
Serena Williams loses her cool during the US Open final against Naomi Osaka on Saturday.
lightbox-info

Serena Williams loses her cool during the US Open final against Naomi Osaka on Saturday.

Umpire Carlos Ramos should have tried to "defuse the situation" before issuing a game penalty to an irate Serena Williams in the US Open final, said Lindsay Davenport. 

Williams was issued a code violation for what the umpire deemed to be coaching from Patrick Mouratoglou, irking the 23-time major champion who insisted she was not a cheat.

RELATED| Osaka defeats Serena in dramatic final

A point penalty for racquet abuse led to her branding Ramos a "liar" and a "thief" and she was then docked a game, following which she called for the match referee and alleged she was being treated differently to male players.

Williams was in tears as she saw out a 6-2, 6-4 loss to Naomi Osaka, whose maiden Grand Slam triumph was overshadowed by the American's argument with the official.

Davenport, a three-time major winner who won the US Open in 1998, felt Ramos could have done more to stop the situation escalating. "Carlos Ramos is a great umpire but he never tried to defuse the situation with Serena," Davenport said on the Tennis Channel .

"In that whole tirade, easily he could have said: 'Serena, a couple more words here and you're going to get a game here.'

RELATED| Serena fined $17,000 after US Open final outburst

"A lot of times you can give soft warnings for coaching as well to kind of warn the player.

"There's a lot of things he could have done along the way to maybe not get to the point where it was game [violation] and really change the whole narrative of this match."

Davenport believes in-match guidance from coaches, which is allowed on the WTA Tour but not in Grand Slams, is widespread in majors and Ramos could have explained he was targeting Mouratoglou with his first code violation and not Williams.

She said: "Also, how many times do coaches actually get warnings for coaching?

"You very rarely see it. We've never really seen it from Serena before.

"[It was] tnteresting in his interview post-match [that] Mouratoglou said, 'Yes I was coaching, I'll admit to it.'

"Then he got a little tacky when he then accused all coaches … he kind of went off the rails a little bit but he definitely copped to it that it always happens.

RELATED| Osaka apologises for defeating favourite Serena

"The chair umpires almost never call it so to call it in a Grand Slam final against a player that's never really had it before, it just seemed odd.

"That's another place where Ramos could've inserted himself and said, 'This is not about you, this is all on your coach up there…that was my way of telling him to be quiet.' Ramos didn't handle some of those conversations very well."

Sign in to unlock all user benefits
  • Get notified on top games and events
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign up / manage to our newsletters with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early bird access to discounts & offers to our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide to our community guidelines for posting your comment