Japan Olympic Committee chief Takeda stepping down after term ends

French prosecutors placed Takeda under formal investigation in December for suspected corruption in Japan's successful bid to host the 2020 Summer Games.

Tsunekazu Takeda had been indicted in France for corruption linked to the Tokyo 2020 bid.

The head of Japan's Olympic Committee said on Tuesday he would step down in June, as French authorities probe his involvement in payments made before Tokyo was awarded the 2020 Summer Games.

“On June 27, my term will expire,” Tsunekazu Takeda said at a meeting of the Japan Olympic Committee (JOC) in Tokyo.

“Considering the future of the JOC, I think the most appropriate thing is to leave things to a new leader from the next generation so that they can host the Olympics and carve a new era.”

The 71-year-old said he would also be stepping down from the International Olympic Committee.

READ |  Japanese Olympic chief indicted in France for corruption

Takeda has come under pressure not to seek an additional term when his current mandate ends in June after it was revealed that French authorities believe they have evidence of corruption in the awarding of the 2020 Games to Tokyo.

Current JOC rules require candidates for the top post to be 70 or younger at the time of their candidacy, but there had been rumours the committee was considering a change to allow Takeda to stay on through 2020.

READ| Japan Olympic chief denies bribery charges after France indictment

In recent months however, the investigation into Takeda has become an unwelcome distraction for organisers of the Games, with less than 500 days until the opening ceremony.

A former Olympic showjumper who spearheaded Japan's bid to host the Games for a second time, Takeda initially appeared likely to try to keep his post until the flame was lit in Tokyo.

In January, it was revealed that he was facing a judicial process in France over two payments totalling 2.8 million Singapore dollars (US$2.1 million at today's exchange rate).

He has been placed “mis en examen”, a legal step that has no direct equivalent in the British or US legal systems and roughly translates as being charged.

It does not automatically trigger a trial but means that prosecutors believe there is strong or corroborated evidence of wrongdoing.