Angelique is magnifique

Serena Williams was expected to restore order in the Wimbledon final, but her German opponent flipped the script.

The 11th-seeded Angelique Kerber defeated Next Gen standouts No.18 Naomi Osaka, former top-tenner Belinda Bencic, No.14 Daria Kasatkina and 2017 French Open champion Jelena Ostapenko on the way to the final.   -  AFP

“The art of lawn tennis is control and restraint and hitting the ball where the other guy ain’t.” – Harry Hopman, famous Australian Davis Cup captain.

In a topsy-turvy tournament filled with surprises, Angelique Kerber flipped the women’s script one last time. All top 10 seeds had tasted defeat before the quarterfinals for the first time in Wimbledon history. Certainly Serena Williams would restore order in the final, as nearly everyone expected.

The 23-time Grand Slam champion likes to refer to herself with superlatives, such as Superwoman. Merely being called the greatest female athlete makes her bristle; she considers herself “the greatest athlete,” period. Merely beating her opponents isn’t sufficient. During Wimbledon, she stressed that she must beat them “emphatically.” When she finishes off foes with her trademark fire and fury, the prideful American sometimes raises her muscular right arm and points her forefinger skyward to remind everyone she’s still No.1, even if her ranking indicates otherwise.

But even the supremely egotistical Williams occasionally admits she’s human. After defeating Julia Goerges 6-2, 6-4 in the Wimbledon semifinals, she conceded to the BBC, “This is not inevitable.” Williams talked about the trauma of undergoing multiple surgeries following the birth of her daughter Alexis Olympia last September, noting: “I almost didn’t make it to be honest. I remember I couldn’t even walk to my mailbox, so it’s definitely not normal for me to be in a Wimbledon final.”

Maybe not “normal” given this Wimbledon was only her fourth tournament since winning the Australian Open while pregnant 17 months ago. Maybe not “inevitable” either given the chaos in the women’s draw. But 36-year-old Williams had overcome adversity so often in her illustrious 22-year pro career – from the tragic murder of her half-sister to her parents’ divorce to assorted career-threatening illnesses and injuries. Why not yet again?

While Williams was bidding to equal Margaret Court’s all-time record of 24 Major titles and become the first mother to hoist the Wimbledon ladies’ trophy since Evonne Goolagong in 1980, Angie was fashioning quite a comeback of her own. In 2016, she catapulted from a solid top-10 player to a champion, capturing the Australian and US Opens, reaching the final at Wimbledon and the WTA Finals and winning an Olympic silver medal. In 2017, though, she couldn’t cope with the fame and expectations. Euphoria turned into disappointment. Kerber won no tournaments and plummeted to No.21.

Her fortune changed yet again this season. With new coach Wim Fissette coaxing her to play more aggressively, she improved her form and results. The 30-year-old German made the Australian Open semifinals, losing a 6-3, 4-6, 9-7 heartbreaker to No.1 Simona Halep after holding match point. Angie also made the French Open quarters, won Sydney and reached the semis at Dubai and Eastbourne, a Wimbledon tune-up event on grass.

Their comebacks and their 30-something ages aside, Williams and Kerber have little in common. Serena is brash and controversial; Angie is reserved and well-liked. Serena is a righty power player with a booming serve; Angie is a consistent lefty with no dominating shot. Serena pals around with the rich, famous and royal, such as the Duchess of Sussex, Meghan Markle, who sat in the Royal Box at Wimbledon. Angie avoids the limelight and likes to hang out with friends – commoners, as they would say in England. She and her mother even waited for the public bus after her semifinal victory.

Unlike many Tour players, Kerber is not intimidated by Williams’ ferocious power or imperious persona. Although the American led their rivalry 6-2, they had split their most recent matches in 2016. Kerber prevailed 6-4, 3-6, 6-4 in the Australian final, while Williams avenged that loss with a 7-5, 6-3 win in the Wimbledon final. The pundits almost unanimously picked Williams to win this eagerly anticipated final at The Championships (Wimbledon’s real name). But the case for the underestimated Kerber was strong. Not only had she achieved far superior results this year than Williams, who had played just seven matches, she had also faced and conquered a vastly tougher Wimbledon draw. The 11th-seeded Kerber defeated Next Gen standouts No.18 Naomi Osaka, former top-tenner Belinda Bencic, No.14 Daria Kasatkina and 2017 French Open champion Jelena Ostapenko. Incredibly, the 25th-seeded Serena encountered just one player ranked in the top 50, No.13 Goerges, who was knocked out in the first round in the five previous Wimbledons.

Kerber, who is nothing if not smart, won the toss and chose to receive despite the fact that Williams possesses the greatest women’s serve in history. Why the counterintuitive decision? “I was quite nervous before the match,” Kerber admitted later. She didn’t want her vulnerable serve broken to start the biggest match of her resurgent year. Equally important, Williams was still far from being “match-tough,” especially against elite competition. She likely was equally, if not more, nervous.

Pressure on Serena

Serena Williams, seeded 25th, encountered just one player ranked in the top 50, No.13 Julia Goerges.   -  AFP

 

As the players walked onto Centre Court carrying a bouquet of flowers (a quaint Wimbledon tradition), it was the unsmiling Williams – the winner of 23 of her previous 29 Major finals – who appeared extremely tense. “Kerber is playing just as well as she did two years ago when she was No.1,” said all-time great Chris Evert, an ESPN analyst. “The pressure is all on Serena Williams.”

Williams quickly succumbed to the pressure by making four unforced errors and losing her serve in the opening game. An ominous sign because in each of her six previous matches, Serena had not committed more than 11 errors.

But would – could – Kerber continue to extract errors from the heavy-hitting Serena? Would Kerber’s ability to retrieve, change pace, absorb power, use clever angles, deceptively change the direction of Williams’ shots and counterpunch offset her weak second serve and a barrage of big shots from Williams?

Williams won three straight games to go ahead 3-2. In the fifth game of the set, Williams kicked a wide serve for an 88 mph ace and a 125 mph rocket for another ace. The latter serve was faster than any serve Novak Djokovic and Rafael Nadal hit during their epic 5-hour, 15-minute semifinal.

But Williams’ performance deteriorated from that brief apex. She lost her serve with a highly unusual two straight double faults in the seventh game. Then she lost it again with three unforced backhand errors and a bad volley mistake to give away the first set 6-3. The greatest women’s server in history had already had her serve broken three times, shocking also because in her six previous matches, her serve was broken a total of seven times.

Watching the ineptitude of a tennis legend is always cringe-inducing. In a quick poll taken by ESPN.com CourtCast, 59 per cent of respondents predicted that Williams would come back to win the match. They would be proven overly optimistic.

The hyper-steady Kerber, who had returned a terrific 88 per cent of her opponents’ serves before the final, had little trouble with Williams’. And age had also slowed Serena’s feet. “Serena is not moving as well as she had before,” pointed out Evert. “She’s late [arriving], and she’s not getting down to the ball.”

Williams also appeared to have lost her mojo. For inspiration, she would have done well to recall an early lesson she had learned from her mother, Oracene Price. When Serena and Venus were young, Price took them on a trip to Africa. Watching a pride of lions there, she told them the lioness is not just a protector but also an aggressor. She told Serena and Venus to be like a lioness.

In the second set, Kerber kept holding her serve and waiting for Williams to selfdestruct again. It happened with Williams serving at 2-3. When the seven-time Wimbledon singles champion indecisively settled for a half-volley, Kerber ripped a forehand passing shot to earn a double break point at 15-40. Two points later, Kerber proved she’s more than a brilliant counter-puncher. With a Nadal-like sprint and leap, she pounded a spectacular forehand winner down the line. That service break for a 4-2 lead would be all Kerber needed because she comfortably held serve the next two times at 15 and at 30.

After Williams missed a backhand service return on championship point, an exultant Kerber fell on her back on the lush grass and covered her eyes with her hands. The surprisingly easy 6-3, 6-3 triumph made Kerber only the second player – the other being Venus Williams – to beat the great Serena Williams twice in Grand Slam finals. The feat also gave her a title at three different Majors, with only a French Open title needed for a rare career Grand Slam. Interestingly, the last four Grand Slam champions – Sloane Stephens, Caroline Wozniacki, Halep and Kerber – have won because of consistency, not power. And parity has become more pronounced than ever with an unbelievable seven different winners at the last seven majors.

Kerber was born in 1988, the year German superstar Steffi Graf captured tennis’ only “Golden Slam” – the four Majors and an Olympic gold medal. In 1996, Kerber watched Graf win her seventh and last Wimbledon, and she idolized her. “When I was a little kid, I always dreamed of winning Wimbledon,” she told ESPN.

About her late-career renaissance, Kerber explained, “I think without 2017, I couldn’t win this tournament. I think I learned a lot from last year, with all the expectations, all the things I went through. I learned so many things about myself, about the things around, how to deal with this, how to make my day schedule. I learned I have to practice. I have to take some time off. I learned about handling the pressure. It is a game. And I love this game. And I’ve tried to enjoy every moment on court this year. I showed everyone that I can come back.”

Besides adding power to her serve and playing more aggressively overall, Kerber improved her mental game. On her earlier and costly tendency to become temperamental and lose focus, Kerber acknowledged, “Changing wasn’t so easy because I’m a very emotional person. It took a while. It’s a process. I know I have to stay cool and relaxed. I can deal with the pressure better at 30 than at 21.”

Kerber sure dealt with the pressure in the final, committing just five unforced errors – compared to Serena’s 24 – in 101 total points. While she kept her nerves in check, “Serena froze a bit,” as ESPN analyst Mary Joe Fernandez noted. This highly efficient performance reinforced Kerber’s reputation as a clutch big-match competitor, as it marked her third triumph in four Major finals, two coming against Serena.

Other than absurdly claiming that Kerber “played out of her mind,” Williams’ post-final comments were gracious. To her credit, Williams accentuated the positives despite her dismal defeat. “It was a great opportunity for me,” she said. “You know, I didn’t know a couple of months ago where I was, where I would be, how I would do, how I would be able to come back. It was such a long way to see light at the end of the road kind of. So I think these two weeks have really showed me that, ‘Okay, I can compete.’ Obviously I can compete for the long run in a Grand Slam. I can, you know, come out and be a contender to win Grand Slams.”

A contender, yes. But Serena’s glorious time at the top may finally be over. Time waits for no man – or woman.

Support Sportstar


Dear Reader,

Support our journalism — where text and pictures intermingle so seamlessly — and help us scale up your experience as the world changes around us. Your contribution is vital to our brand of uninfluenced, boots-on-the-ground reportage that’s worth your while. Clickbait sensationalism is not for us, but editorial independence is — we owe it to you.