WPL 2023: DRS error in UP Warriorz vs Mumbai Indians match leaves players, fans confused

WPL 2023: In a cagey clash between UP Warriorz and Mumbai Indians, MI opener Hayley Matthews stood her ground despite being ruled out lbw by the third umpire and she was right too. Here’s what happened.

Published : Mar 12, 2023 22:39 IST

An appeal to dismiss Hayley Matthews gave the Women’s Premier League one of its most controversial DRS calls.
An appeal to dismiss Hayley Matthews gave the Women’s Premier League one of its most controversial DRS calls. | Photo Credit: Screengrab/Jio Cinema
infoIcon

An appeal to dismiss Hayley Matthews gave the Women’s Premier League one of its most controversial DRS calls. | Photo Credit: Screengrab/Jio Cinema

A third umpire call during the chase in the UP Warriorz vs Mumbai Indians Women’s Premier League fixture in Mumbai has stirred up quite the controversy.

Sophie Ecclestone’s yorker to Hayley Matthews in the fifth over first appeared to have caught the Mumbai opener plumb in front.

Ecclestone looked to her captain Alyssa Healy, who looked unsure as she said, “I don’t know,” referring to whether the ball got either toe or pad first to stand for an lbw appeal.

On field umpire Pashchim Pathak was not convinced with the appeals and denied UP the wicket. This prompted Healy to reluctantly review the call.

UP Warriorz’ Sophie Ecclestone and Alyssa Healy decided to review a yorker which they believed had Hayley Matthews caught lbw.
UP Warriorz’ Sophie Ecclestone and Alyssa Healy decided to review a yorker which they believed had Hayley Matthews caught lbw.
lightbox-info

UP Warriorz’ Sophie Ecclestone and Alyssa Healy decided to review a yorker which they believed had Hayley Matthews caught lbw.

The third umpire’s replay appeared to show the ball deflecting off Matthews’ toe before hitting the bat and ball tracking showed the ball going straight into the middle stump.

This was the first angle made available to the third umpire which showed a spike when the ball went close to the Hayley Matthews’ left toe.
This was the first angle made available to the third umpire which showed a spike when the ball went close to the Hayley Matthews’ left toe.
lightbox-info

This was the first angle made available to the third umpire which showed a spike when the ball went close to the Hayley Matthews’ left toe.

With ball tracking showing the ball going straight into the middle stump, it seemed to be a straightforward decision to declare Matthews out lbw.
With ball tracking showing the ball going straight into the middle stump, it seemed to be a straightforward decision to declare Matthews out lbw.
lightbox-info

With ball tracking showing the ball going straight into the middle stump, it seemed to be a straightforward decision to declare Matthews out lbw.

Given the information from the third umpire, Pathak raised his finger leaving Matthews in disbelief.

The Mumbai opener stood her ground, discussing the development with Healy and Ecclestone. The umpires - Pathak and N. Janani meanwhile also seemed to still be discussing the dismissal, looking unconvinced.

The umpires were unconvinced with the decision to give Hayley Matthews out
The umpires were unconvinced with the decision to give Hayley Matthews out
lightbox-info

The umpires were unconvinced with the decision to give Hayley Matthews out

Just when she started reluctantly trudging towards the pavilion, the umpires decided to take a second look at the delivery. This time, the third umpire looked at a longer shot of the ball which showed the ball coming to the toe off the bat first as opposed to going directly to the toe as was thought earlier.

Hayley Matthews was delighted to be vindicated after the decision to declare her out was rescinded. She lasted only for seven more balls after this delivery.
Hayley Matthews was delighted to be vindicated after the decision to declare her out was rescinded. She lasted only for seven more balls after this delivery.
lightbox-info

Hayley Matthews was delighted to be vindicated after the decision to declare her out was rescinded. She lasted only for seven more balls after this delivery.

Pathak was then directed to stick to his original decision of not-out. Here’s how fans and pundits reacted to the bizarre turn of events.

Watch the entire passage of play here.

Sign in to unlock all user benefits
  • Get notified on top games and events
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign up / manage to our newsletters with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early bird access to discounts & offers to our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide to our community guidelines for posting your comment