FIFPRO wants specific measures to protect players from overload

rather than shorten competition formats and eliminate fixtures, most federations and leagues are cramming them into a shorter period of time, producing a concertina effect.

Published : Jul 20, 2020 20:38 IST , BERN

One idea proposed from FIFPro would be a so-called match cap to limit the number of games for players in a season, but not clubs.
One idea proposed from FIFPro would be a so-called match cap to limit the number of games for players in a season, but not clubs.
lightbox-info

One idea proposed from FIFPro would be a so-called match cap to limit the number of games for players in a season, but not clubs.

The global footballers' union FIFPRO wants concrete safeguards to protect players from fixture overload and the consequent risk of injury as the sport catches up with a backlog of matches following the novel coronavirus stoppage.

FIFPRO general secretary Jonas Baer-Hoffmann told Reuters that, with the sport facing an overcrowded calendar for the next three years, the union was talking to European clubs and leagues to find ways of protecting players.

READ |

“There is the big question of how we manage the load in a very condensed period,” he said. “We can't just leave it to the mercy of individual decisions because we know how big the pressure is on the players and nobody is going to benefit from additional injuries.”

The new coronavirus halted football for three to four months around Europe and longer in some other parts of the world.

But, rather than shorten competition formats and eliminate fixtures, most federations and leagues are simply cramming them into a shorter period of time, producing a concertina effect.

The only major exception is the Champions League and Europa League where UEFA has replaced two-leg ties with single-leg ties for the end of this season and the start of next.

“From now to three years ahead, the calendar is completely overloaded,” said Baer-Hoffman.

“The only solution is to put a framework in place to manage the load and guarantee recovery periods,” he added, citing two mandatory rest periods per year as an example of a rule that could be implemented.

“We need sensible rules based on medically-approved safety standards.”

PLAYER OVERLOAD

FIFPRO had expressed concern about player overload even before the coronavirus stoppage and a report last year said players needed five days' rest between matches -- compared to two to thee days at present in England and Italy.

One example FIFPRO gave in that report was Barcelona's Croatia midfielder Ivan Rakitic who it said had played 68 games between May 2018 and June 2019.

One idea proposed would be a so-called match cap to limit the number of games for players in a season, but not clubs.

READ |

Baer-Hoffmann said that with the first round of South American World Cup qualifiers pencilled in for October, the restart of internationals had led to concern that players may travel to countries where coronavirus cases are still surging.

“We need to ensure that players are not put under pressure to travel to countries where the pandemic may still be a threat, otherwise it's not going to be sustainable,” he said.

Similarly, FIFPRO is worried about leagues starting in countries where infection rates are still high.

“In certain countries, health standards are not what we would want, commercial pressures are overriding health and safety precautions and players are vulnerable to pressure because they need to play to put food on the table,” he said.

Sign in to unlock all user benefits
  • Get notified on top games and events
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign up / manage to our newsletters with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early bird access to discounts & offers to our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide to our community guidelines for posting your comment