Anderson edges Isner 26-24 in 5th for 1st Wimbledon final

The duo combined to produce the second-longest match in the tournament's history, with their epic duel eventually ending after six hours and 35 minutes.

Published : Jul 14, 2018 00:37 IST , LONDON

Kevin Anderson won the longest Centre Court match in history and earned a chance to try to collect his first Grand Slam championship.
Kevin Anderson won the longest Centre Court match in history and earned a chance to try to collect his first Grand Slam championship.
lightbox-info

Kevin Anderson won the longest Centre Court match in history and earned a chance to try to collect his first Grand Slam championship.

Kevin Anderson overcame John Isner in a record-breaking battle on Centre Court to secure a place in the Wimbledon final.

Having needed five sets to stun Roger Federer in the last round, Anderson eventually triumphed 7-6 (8-6) 6-7 (5-7) 6-7 (9-11) 6-4 26-24 in a battle between two of the biggest servers on the ATP Tour.

The duo combined to produce the second-longest match in the tournament's history, with their epic duel eventually ending after six hours and 35 minutes.

The final set alone lasted an astonishing two hours and 50 minutes, forcing Rafael Nadal and Novak Djokovic to wait patiently in the wings to start their mouthwatering clash.

Isner is no stranger to marathon matches at SW19 - he holds the record at the venue after going a staggering 11 hours and five minutes in his victory against Nicolas Mahut in 2010 - but he was the first to buckle in a decider that felt like it might never end.

After failing to convert four earlier break-point opportunities in the fifth set, Anderson finally claimed the all-important lead in the 49th game before serving out for the match.

Defeat was tough on Isner, who had never previously gone beyond the third round at the All England Club before this year’s run to the final four.

The American lost the opener on a tie-break but hit back to take the next two in the same manner, even though his streak for holding serve ended at 110 games in the third set.

After taking a medical timeout after falling 2-1 behind, Anderson appeared rejuvenated in a frenetic fourth, trading breaks before the combination of a passing shot and an unreturned serve levelled matters at two sets apiece.

Yet if it was tough to split the pair beforehand, it became nigh-on impossible to work out who would win in a decider that felt like it may never come to an end.

Isner needed treatment for a blister on his right hand when 5-4 ahead but the delay did not break Anderson's concentration, as he held firm on serve in what became a battle of both physical stamina and mental strength.

Anderson looked the more likely to prevail as he created opportunities to claim the key break, only for the ninth seed to respond by ratcheting up the pace of his serve to blast his way out of trouble.

Eventually, though, he blinked first in the staring contest. Having fallen 0-40 behind, Isner failed to dig himself out of trouble once again, Anderson even briefly switching it up by becoming a left-handed player during an eventful game he finally won at the second attempt.

The South African’s perseverance will see him line up against either Nadal – who defeated Anderson in the final of the 2017 US Open in straight sets - or Djokovic on Sunday.

STATISTICAL BREAKDOWN
Anderson [8] bt Isner [9] 7-6 (8-6) 6-7 (5-7) 6-7 (9-11) 6-4 26-24

WINNERS/UNFORCED ERRORS
Anderson 118/24
Isner 129/58

ACES/DOUBLE FAULTS
Anderson 49/4
Isner 53/6

BREAK POINTS WON
Anderson 4/11
Isner 2/5

FIRST SERVE PERCENTAGE
Anderson - 71
Isner - 75

PERCENTAGE OF POINTS WON ON FIRST/SECOND SERVE
Anderson 84/59
Isner 78/48

TOTAL POINTS
Anderson - 297
Isner - 271

Sign in to unlock all user benefits
  • Get notified on top games and events
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign up / manage to our newsletters with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early bird access to discounts & offers to our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide to our community guidelines for posting your comment