AIFF Disciplinary Committee rejects Kerala Blasters’ protest

The AIFF Disciplinary Committee rejected the protest lodged by Kerala Blasters FC in connection with the ISL playoff match against Bengaluru FC played on March 3, 2023, at the Kanteerava Stadium, in Bengaluru.

Published : Mar 07, 2023 18:50 IST

Ivan Vukomanovic, Head coach of Kerala Blasters FC speaks with Simon Grayson, Head coach of Bengaluru FC during the first knockout match of the ISL at the Sree Kanteerava Stadium, Bengaluru.
Ivan Vukomanovic, Head coach of Kerala Blasters FC speaks with Simon Grayson, Head coach of Bengaluru FC during the first knockout match of the ISL at the Sree Kanteerava Stadium, Bengaluru. | Photo Credit: Vipin Pawar/Focus Sports/ ISL
infoIcon

Ivan Vukomanovic, Head coach of Kerala Blasters FC speaks with Simon Grayson, Head coach of Bengaluru FC during the first knockout match of the ISL at the Sree Kanteerava Stadium, Bengaluru. | Photo Credit: Vipin Pawar/Focus Sports/ ISL

The All India Football Federation (AIFF) Disciplinary Committee, which met on Monday, March 6, 2023, under chairperson Mr Vaibhav Gaggar, rejected the protest lodged by Kerala Blasters FC (KBFC) in connection with the Indian Super League (ISL) match against Bengaluru FC (BFC) played on Friday, March 3, 2023, at the Kanteerava Stadium, in Bengaluru.

In its protest, Kerala Blasters FC disputed a goal scored by Bengaluru FC off a free-kick, which was declared legitimate by the referee. KBFC’s club management said, “The Referee allowed a player from BFC to take a free-kick without blowing a whistle.”

The Kerala Blasters also sought relief on two counts, saying, the match should be replayed and strict action should be taken against the said referee, Crystal John.

After considering the protest and going through the laws of the game as well as the reports by the officials, the Committee said that it is of the view that the “protest is not maintainable in law, as the conjoint comprehensive and holistic reading of the League Rules and the Code clearly provides that no protest can be entertained against a Referee’s decisions since the said decisions are final and binding.”

It further stated, “The facts of the present case depict that the incident does not even fall within the exception carved out in Article 70.5 of the Code. Thus, the present Protest letter/report/petition is dismissed.”

Sign in to unlock all user benefits
  • Get notified on top games and events
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign up / manage to our newsletters with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early bird access to discounts & offers to our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide to our community guidelines for posting your comment